lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 12 Jun 2013 09:51:14 +0900
From:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	kyungmin.park@...sung.com, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH] cpufreq: stats: Add 'load_table' sysfs file to
 show accumulated data of CPU

Hi Rafael,

On 06/12/2013 07:14 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 05, 2013 05:11:22 PM Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> This patch add new sysfs file to show previous accumulated data of CPU load
>> as following path. This sysfs file is used to judge the correct system state
>> or determine suitable system resource on user-space.
>> - /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/stats/load_table
>>
>> This sysfs file include following data:
>> - Measurement point of time
>> - CPU frequency
>> - Per-CPU load
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
> Well, first of all, there is the "one value per file" rule for sysfs attributes
> which is evidently violated by this code.

OK, then I will use debugfs for tacking cpu load instead of sysfs.
What is your opinion using debugfs?

> Second, this looks like a feature needed to handle one particular platform, so
> why do you want to add it to the cpufreq core?

I have cpu hotplug feature in user-space to reduce power-consumption
because of estimating difference power-consumption according to a number
of online cpu. The cpu hotplug feature in user-space must need accumulated data of
per-cpu load and current cpu frequency to monitor current system state(cpu load).

My goal is that cpu hotplug feature must use only standard kernel node and
be always operated on mainline kernel. So, I want to add load_table sysfs as standard kernel node.

Thanks,

Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
>> ---
>>
>> Additionally, I explain an example using 'load_table' sysfs entry.
>>
>> Exynos4412 series has Quad-core and all cores share the power-line.
>> I cann't set diffent voltage/frequency to each CPU. To reduce power-
>> consumption, I certainly have to turn on/off CPU online state
>> according to CPU load on runtime. As a result, I peridically need to
>> monitor current cpu state to determine a proper amount of system
>> resource(necessary number of online cpu) and to delete wasted power.
>> So, I need 'load_table' sysfs file to monitor current cpu state.
>>
>> I add a table which show power consumption of target based on
>> Exynos4412 SoC. This table indicate the difference power-consumption
>> according to a number of online core and with same number of running task.
>>
>> [Environment of power estimation]
>> - cpufreq governor used performance mode to estimate power-consumption on each frequency step.
>> - Use infinite-loop test program which execute while statement infinitely.
>> - Always measure the power consumption under same temperature during 1 minutes.
>> - Unit is mA.
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> A number of Online core	| Core 1	| Core 2		| Core 3			| Core 4
>> A number of nr_running	| 0	1	| 0	1	2	| 0	1	2	3	| 0	1	2	3	4
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  CPU Frequency		| 
>>  800  MHz		| 293 	330 	| 295 	338 	379 	| 300 	339 	386 	433 	| 303 	341 	390 	412 	482 
>>  1000 MHz		| 312 	371 	| 316 	377 	435 	| 318 	383 	454 	522 	| 322 	391 	462 	526 	596 
>>  1200 MHz		| 323 	404 	| 328 	418 	504 	| 336 	423 	521 	615 	| 343 	433 	499 	639 	748 
>>  1600 MHz 		| 380 	525 	| 388 	556 	771 	| 399 	575 	771 	1011 	| 412 	597 	822 	1172 	1684 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> For example,
>> The case A/B/C have the same condition except for a number of online core.
>> - case A: Online core is 2, 1000MHz and nr_running is 1	: 377mA
>> - case B: Online core is 3, 1000MHz and nr_running is 1	: 383mA
>> - case C: Online core is 4, 1000Mz and nr_running is 1	: 391mA
>>
>> If system has only one running task, cpu hotplug policy, by monitoring
>> cpu state through 'load_table' sysfs file on user-space,
>> will determine 'case A' state for reducing power-consumption.
>>
>> Show the result of reading 'load_table sysfs file as following:
>> - cpufreq governor is ondemand_org governor.
>>
>> $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/stats/load_table
>>        Time  Frequency cpu0 cpu1 cpu2 cpu3
>> 1300500043122   1600000   32    6    0   26
>> 1300600079080    800000   63   10    2   45
>> 1300700065288    800000   51    9    1   42
>> 1300800228747    800000   51    9    1   43
>> 1300900182997    800000   78   11    3   47
>> 1301000106163    800000   96   26    6   48
>> 1301100056247   1600000   45    7    1   27
>> 1301200071373   1000000   55    9    1   37
>> 1301300096082    800000   54   10    0   45
>> 1301400132832    800000   70   11    2   46
>> 1301500082290    800000   61   11    1   43
>> 1301600236415    800000   61    9    2   43
>> 1301700071498    800000   59   10    2   43
>> 1301800159290    800000   55    9    1   42
>> 1301900076332    800000   66   10    2   43
>> 1302000102165    800000   47    9    0   43
>> 1302100086623    800000   75   11    2   50
>> 1302200101082    800000   66   10    4   46
>> 1302300108873    800000   53   10    1   44
>> 1302400373373    600000   63   12    1   54

>> Please let me know some opinion about this patch.
>>
>> Best regards and Thanks,
>> Chanwoo Choi
>>
>> ---
>>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c          |  4 +++
>>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 21 ++++++++++--
>>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c    | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/linux/cpufreq.h            |  6 ++++
>>  4 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>> index 2d53f47..cbaaff0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>> @@ -292,6 +292,10 @@ void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>>  		if (likely(policy) && likely(policy->cpu == freqs->cpu))
>>  			policy->cur = freqs->new;
>>  		break;
>> +	case CPUFREQ_LOADCHECK:
>> +		srcu_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_transition_notifier_list,
>> +				CPUFREQ_LOADCHECK, freqs);
>> +		break;
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  /**
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
>> index 5af40ad..bc50624 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
>> @@ -23,12 +23,17 @@
>>  #include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
>>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
>>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/sched.h>
>>  #include <linux/tick.h>
>>  #include <linux/types.h>
>>  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>>  
>>  #include "cpufreq_governor.h"
>>  
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS
>> +	struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
>> +#endif
>> +
>>  static struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>>  {
>>  	if (have_governor_per_policy())
>> @@ -143,11 +148,17 @@ void dbs_check_cpu(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, int cpu)
>>  			idle_time += jiffies_to_usecs(cur_nice_jiffies);
>>  		}
>>  
>> -		if (unlikely(!wall_time || wall_time < idle_time))
>> +		if (unlikely(!wall_time || wall_time < idle_time)) {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS
>> +			freqs.load[j] = 0;
>> +#endif
>>  			continue;
>> +		}
>>  
>>  		load = 100 * (wall_time - idle_time) / wall_time;
>> -
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS
>> +		freqs.load[j] = load;
>> +#endif
>>  		if (dbs_data->cdata->governor == GOV_ONDEMAND) {
>>  			int freq_avg = __cpufreq_driver_getavg(policy, j);
>>  			if (freq_avg <= 0)
>> @@ -160,6 +171,12 @@ void dbs_check_cpu(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, int cpu)
>>  			max_load = load;
>>  	}
>>  
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS
>> +	freqs.time = ktime_to_ns(ktime_get());
>> +	freqs.old = freqs.new = policy->cur;
>> +
>> +	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_LOADCHECK);
>> +#endif
>>  	dbs_data->cdata->gov_check_cpu(cpu, max_load);
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dbs_check_cpu);
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
>> index fb65dec..2379b1d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
>>  #include <linux/notifier.h>
>>  #include <asm/cputime.h>
>>  
>> +#define CPUFREQ_LOAD_TABLE_MAX		20
>> +
>>  static spinlock_t cpufreq_stats_lock;
>>  
>>  struct cpufreq_stats {
>> @@ -35,6 +37,10 @@ struct cpufreq_stats {
>>  	unsigned int *freq_table;
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS
>>  	unsigned int *trans_table;
>> +
>> +	struct cpufreq_freqs *load_table;
>> +	unsigned int load_last_index;
>> +	unsigned int load_max_index;
>>  #endif
>>  };
>>  
>> @@ -131,6 +137,38 @@ static ssize_t show_trans_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
>>  	return len;
>>  }
>>  cpufreq_freq_attr_ro(trans_table);
>> +
>> +static ssize_t show_load_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
>> +{
>> +	struct cpufreq_stats *stat = per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, policy->cpu);
>> +	struct cpufreq_freqs *load_table = stat->load_table;
>> +	ssize_t len = 0;
>> +	int i;
>> +	int j;
>> +
>> +	len += sprintf(buf + len, "%11s %10s", "Time", "Frequency");
>> +	for (j = 0; j < NR_CPUS; j++)
>> +		len += sprintf(buf + len, " %3s%d", "cpu", j);
>> +	len += sprintf(buf + len, "\n");
>> +
>> +	i = stat->load_last_index;
>> +	do {
>> +		len += sprintf(buf + len, "%lld %9d",
>> +				load_table[i].time,
>> +				load_table[i].old);
>> +
>> +		for (j = 0; j < NR_CPUS; j++)
>> +			len += sprintf(buf + len, " %4d",
>> +					load_table[i].load[j]);
>> +		len += sprintf(buf + len, "\n");
>> +
>> +		if (++i == stat->load_max_index)
>> +			i = 0;
>> +	} while (i != stat->load_last_index);
>> +
>> +	return len;
>> +}
>> +cpufreq_freq_attr_ro(load_table);
>>  #endif
>>  
>>  cpufreq_freq_attr_ro(total_trans);
>> @@ -141,6 +179,7 @@ static struct attribute *default_attrs[] = {
>>  	&time_in_state.attr,
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS
>>  	&trans_table.attr,
>> +	&load_table.attr,
>>  #endif
>>  	NULL
>>  };
>> @@ -167,6 +206,9 @@ static void cpufreq_stats_free_table(unsigned int cpu)
>>  
>>  	if (stat) {
>>  		pr_debug("%s: Free stat table\n", __func__);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS
>> +		kfree(stat->load_table);
>> +#endif
>>  		kfree(stat->time_in_state);
>>  		kfree(stat);
>>  		per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, cpu) = NULL;
>> @@ -244,6 +286,16 @@ static int cpufreq_stats_create_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>>  
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS
>>  	stat->trans_table = stat->freq_table + count;
>> +
>> +	stat->load_max_index = CPUFREQ_LOAD_TABLE_MAX;
>> +	stat->load_last_index = 0;
>> +
>> +	alloc_size = sizeof(struct cpufreq_freqs) * stat->load_max_index;
>> +	stat->load_table = kzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!stat->load_table) {
>> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
>> +		goto error_out;
>> +	}
>>  #endif
>>  	j = 0;
>>  	for (i = 0; table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
>> @@ -312,13 +364,31 @@ static int cpufreq_stat_notifier_trans(struct notifier_block *nb,
>>  	struct cpufreq_stats *stat;
>>  	int old_index, new_index;
>>  
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS
>> +	if (val != CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && val != CPUFREQ_LOADCHECK)
>> +#else
>>  	if (val != CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE)
>> +#endif
>>  		return 0;
>>  
>>  	stat = per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, freq->cpu);
>>  	if (!stat)
>>  		return 0;
>>  
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS
>> +	if (val == CPUFREQ_LOADCHECK) {
>> +		struct cpufreq_freqs *dest_freq;
>> +
>> +		dest_freq = &stat->load_table[stat->load_last_index];
>> +		memcpy(dest_freq, freq, sizeof(struct cpufreq_freqs));
>> +
>> +		if (++stat->load_last_index == stat->load_max_index)
>> +			stat->load_last_index = 0;
>> +
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}
>> +#endif
>> +
>>  	old_index = stat->last_index;
>>  	new_index = freq_table_get_index(stat, freq->new);
>>  
>> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
>> index 037d36a..f780645 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
>> @@ -140,12 +140,18 @@ static inline bool policy_is_shared(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>>  #define CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE	(1)
>>  #define CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE	(8)
>>  #define CPUFREQ_SUSPENDCHANGE	(9)
>> +#define CPUFREQ_LOADCHECK	(10)
>>  
>>  struct cpufreq_freqs {
>>  	unsigned int cpu;	/* cpu nr */
>>  	unsigned int old;
>>  	unsigned int new;
>>  	u8 flags;		/* flags of cpufreq_driver, see below. */
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS
>> +	int64_t time;
>> +	unsigned int load[NR_CPUS];
>> +#endif
>>  };
>>  
>>  
>>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ