linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] irqchip: Add support for ARMv7-M's NVIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130612220008.GG11232@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:08 +0200
From:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, kernel@...gutronix.de
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] irqchip: Add support for ARMv7-M's NVIC

Hello,

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:50:35PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> This interrupt controller is found on Cortex-M3 and Cortex-M4 machines.
> 
> Support for this controller appeared in Catalin's Cortex tree based on
> 2.6.33 but was nearly completely rewritten.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     Changes since v3, sent with
>     Message-Id: <1366214540-31166-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>:
>     
>      - use generic chip
>      - rename nvic_do_IRQ to nvic_handle_irq
>     
>     This depends on the stuff currently in tip/irq/for-arm
It also depends on Russell King's devel-stable branch. So the options to
apply it in case you are otherwise happy with it:

 - apply on top of tip/irq/for-arm dropping the change to
   arch/arm/kernel/entry-v7m.S and let me add that change seperately; or
 - let it go through Russell's tree (the dependency on tip/irq/for-arm
   doesn't stop the patch to be applied on that one, it just won't
   compile); or
 - wait until there is a tree that contains both branches; or
 - merge the two trees and apply it on top of the merge.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/