linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] cpufreq: fix governor start/stop race condition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:40:16 +0800
From:	Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg.marvell@...il.com>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg@...vell.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	njiang1@...vell.com, zjwu@...vell.com, ylmao@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] cpufreq: fix governor start/stop race condition

2013/6/12 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>:
> On 12 June 2013 14:39, Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg@...vell.com> wrote:
>
>>         ret = policy->governor->governor(policy, event);
>
> We again reached to the same problem. We shouldn't call
> this between taking locks, otherwise recursive locks problems
> would be seen again.

But this is not the same lock as the deadlock case, it is a new lock,
and only used in this function. no other functions use this lock.
I don't know how can we get dead lock again?

Thanks
Xiaoguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/