lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 03:01:22 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Dave Chiluk <chiluk@...onical.com>
Cc:	Petr Vandrovec <petr@...drovec.name>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ncpfs: fix rmdir returns Device or resource busy

On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 05:14:52PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 11:09:05AM -0500, Dave Chiluk wrote:
> > Can't you just use the patch from my original e-mail?  Anyhow I attached
> > it an already signed-off patch.
> > 
> > Al Viro Can you integrate it now?
> 
> Applied...  FWIW, patch directly in mail body is more convenient to deal with.

Actually, looking at that stuff...  Why are we bothering with -EBUSY for
removal of busy directories on ncpfs, anyway?  It's not just rmdir(), it's
overwriting rename() as well.  IS_DEADDIR checks in fs/namei.c and fs/readdir.c
mean that the only method of ncpfs directories that might get called after
successful removal is ->setattr() and it would be trivial to add the check
in ncp_notify_change() that would make it fail for dead directories without
bothering the server at all...

Related question: what happens if you open / unlink / fchmod on ncpfs?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists