linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] ARM: s3c64xx: Let amba-pl08x driver handle DMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:22:11 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...dd.com>,
	Giancarlo Asnaghi <giancarlo.asnaghi@...com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	Padmavathi Venna <padma.v@...sung.com>,
	Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@...onic-design.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] ARM: s3c64xx: Let amba-pl08x driver handle DMA

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 08:26:12PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 of June 2013 18:40:47 Mark Brown wrote:

> > -		ret = pd->get_signal(plchan->cd);
> > +		ret = (pd->get_signal)(plchan->cd);

> Hmm, that's strange. The former is a completely valid piece of code...

I know, hence...

> > to get it to build which makes me suspect the compiler a bit as well...

...my comment about suspecting the compiler.

> > I was applying this to -next, are there any other dependencies I need or
> > anything?

> Hmm, I've been testing this on top of my common clock framework and device 
> tree patches, but I don't think this had any effect. Did you add necessary 
> clkdev lookups to the clock driver?

No, I didn't - that's most likely it, I didn't really investigate.  I
didn't test the watchdog stuff as the clocks didn't get sent to me.

> In Samsung CCF alias notation it looks like this:

> +       ALIAS(HCLK_DMA1, "dma-pl080s.1", "apb_pclk"),
> +       ALIAS(HCLK_DMA0, "dma-pl080s.0", "apb_pclk"),

> Not sure how hard it will be to add such lookups to the old clock driver, 
> though.

It's pretty much the same providing you know which clock needs to be
used.

> I will test this applied directly on top of current linux-next when I find 
> some time, but for now you might check out my v3.11-devel branch on my 
> github:

> https://github.com/tom3q/linux.git

Will try to get round to it.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)