linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] RFC: mmc: dw_mmc: Always go to STATE_DATA_BUSY from STATE_DATA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:49:07 +0900
From:	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
To:	Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com>
Cc:	'Doug Anderson' <dianders@...omium.org>,
	'Jaehoon Chung' <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
	'Chris Ball' <cjb@...top.org>,
	'Will Newton' <will.newton@...il.com>,
	'Bing Zhao' <bzhao@...vell.com>,
	'Ashok Nagarajan' <asnagarajan@...omium.org>,
	'Paul Stewart' <pstew@...omium.org>,
	'Olof Johansson' <olof@...om.net>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: mmc: dw_mmc: Always go to STATE_DATA_BUSY from
 STATE_DATA_ERROR

Hi All,

I tested with Seungwon's patch and this patch.
I'm agreed with Seungwon's opinion.

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

On 06/18/2013 09:36 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> On Thursday, June 13, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Seungwon,
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com> wrote:
>>>>> There are two solutions we have applied.
>>>>
>>>> I'm a little confused.  Have you already applied one or both of the
>>>> solutions you list below, or are you proposing them as alternates to
>>>> the patch I submitted?
>>> Yes, first one already has been applied.
>>> I wanted to introduce our fix. Did you try to test with these fixes?
>>
>> I'm coming back to this after being quite distracted for a while.
>>
>> I'm a little confused in that you said that your first fix was already
>> applied.  I don't see it anywhere.  Did you mean that you've already
>> applied it locally, or that it's applied in some git tree somewhere?
>> If so, can you point me to it?
>>
>> If this hasn't been sent out anywhere, perhaps you could send out
>> official patches?
> Currently, it has just applied for some projects, not official patch.
>>
>> I don't have the failing unit myself, so we'll have to get Bing to try
>> the patches.  You are suggesting that we try applying both of your
>> patches, right?
> Did you test the patch?
> I wonder that both are good for your side.
> 
> Thanks,
> Seungwon Jeon
>>
>> -Doug
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/