linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the mailbox tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:01:43 -0700
From:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
	Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez@...itl.com>,
	Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the mailbox tree

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
> * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> [130620 23:48]:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:26:56 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> >
>> > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
>> > drivers/mailbox/Kconfig between commit a1824eaab70f ("mailbox: OMAP:
>> > introduce mailbox framework") from the mailbox tree and commit
>> > c869c75c16b3 ("mailbox/omap: move the OMAP mailbox framework to drivers")
>> > from the arm-soc tree.
>> >
>> > I fixed it up (I suspect not properly - see below) and can carry the fix
>> > as necessary (no action is required).
>> >
>> > It looks like we have two different versions of these changes in
>> > linux-next now, so please clean it all up.  i.e. can I just drop the
>> > mailbox tree now?
>>
>> OK, things went steeply downhill from here, so I went back and removed
>> the mailbox tree ...
>
> I think Olof dropped the earlier version of the mailbox branch, and
> remerged the updated mailbox branch. So if there was also yet another
> mailbox branch being pulled into Linux next, then yes, dropping it is
> the way to go.

No, I only reverted -- I didn't pull in any new branch.

I wonder if this mess is caused by the fact that I did the revert
instead of rebuilding our for-next and dropping the merge in the first
place.

I'll rebuild our for-next (or maybe Arnd will beat me to it) before
next linux-next build, i.e. Sunday night my time.


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/