lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:12:37 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
cc:	Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: clocksource with changing frequency?

On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, John Stultz wrote:

> On 06/20/2013 05:01 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I have a question/problem with a clocksource whose input frequency can
> > change.
> 
> That behavior isn't supported by the clocksource core. We expect frequency
> changing clocksources to be detected and disqualified (as we do w/ freq
> changing TSCs on older laptops).
> 
> 
> > On Zynq we use the cadece_ttc timer as clocksource. Its input clock is
> > tightly coupled to the CPU clock. I.e. it changes when cpufreq scales
> > the CPU clocks.
> > To compensate this, I added a clock notifier doing this on a frequency
> > change:
> > 	clocksource_unregister(&ttccs->cs);
> > 	clocksource_register_hz(&ttccs->cs, ndata->new_rate / PRESCALE);
> 
> This will definitely have problems if this is the only high-res capable
> clocksource.

And starting with 3.11 it will be not longer possible to unregister
the only high-res capable clocksource exactly to prevent the wreckage
you are talking about :)

Thanks,

	tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ