linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-mpidr tree with the arm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 26 Jun 2013 09:57:20 +0100
From:	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-mpidr tree with the arm tree

Hi Stephen,

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 02:04:11AM +0100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-mpidr tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/kernel/suspend.c between commit 7604537bbb57 ("ARM: kernel:
> implement stack pointer save array through MPIDR hashing") from the arm
> tree and commit 3fed6a1e3bf0 ("ARM: kernel: implement stack pointer save
> array through MPIDR hashing") from the arm-mpidr tree.
> 
> The former is just a rebase of the latter, so I used it.  It then turns
> out that the arm-mpidr contains nothing that is not already included in
> the arm tree, so is it needed any more i.e. is there further work coming?

No, arm-mpidr can be dropped from -next now that those patches, as you
correctly mentioned, are queued through the arm tree.

Thank you very much indeed,
Lorenzo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/