lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:58:03 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
CC:	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/6] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

On 06/24/2013 04:27 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> The SimpleDRM driver binds to simple-framebuffer devices and provides a
> DRM/KMS API. It provides only a single CRTC+encoder+connector combination
> plus one initial mode.
> 
> Userspace can create one dumb-buffer and attach it to the CRTC. Only if
> the buffer is destroyed, a new buffer can be created. The buffer is
> directly mapped into user-space, so we have only resources for a single
> buffer. Otherwise, shadow buffers plus damage-request would be needed.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/simpledrm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/simpledrm/Kconfig

> +config DRM_SIMPLEDRM
> +	tristate "Simple firmware framebuffer DRM driver"
> +	depends on DRM && !FB_SIMPLE
> +	help
> +	  SimpleDRM can run on all systems with pre-initialized graphics
> +	  hardware. It uses a framebuffer that was initialized during
> +	  firmware boot. No page-flipping, modesetting or other advanced
> +	  features are available. However, other DRM drivers can be loaded
> +	  later and take over from SimpleDRM if they provide real hardware
> +	  support.
> +
> +	  SimpleDRM supports: "simple-framebuffer" DeviceTree objects, x86 VESA
> +	  BIOS Extensions (VBE), EFI framebuffers

DT objects, yes. I'm not sure it's quite true to say it actually
directly supports VBE or EFI FBs; it's more the code in patch 2/6 that
supports those. I guess this is a bit nit-picky of a distinction though.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/simpledrm/simpledrm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/simpledrm/simpledrm_drv.c

> +static int parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +		    struct simplefb_platform_data *mode)

> +	strlcpy(mode->format, format, sizeof(mode->format));

Even here, I believe the DT data sticks around so just copying the
pointer should be safe. It'd be worth validating that for sure though.

I didn't review the DRM stuff here since I'm not at all familiar with DRM.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ