linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v4 3/5] acpi: Adjust linux acpi OS functions to new extended parameter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:59:12 +0000
From:	"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>
To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
	Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@...rix.com>,
	"Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
	"Box, David E" <david.e.box@...el.com>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>
CC:	"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	"Rafaell J . Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 3/5] acpi: Adjust linux acpi OS functions to new
 extended parameter

I have not seen a discussion of the details on this, so can someone explain to me just why acpi_os_prepare_sleep is needed, what does it do, and why these changes are being made to ACPICA code?

Thanks,
Bob


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@...e.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 8:12 AM
> To: Ben Guthro
> Cc: Moore, Robert; xen-devel@...ts.xen.org; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; Rafaell
> J . Wysocki; linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] acpi: Adjust linux acpi OS functions to new
> extended parameter
> 
> >>> On 27.06.13 at 17:02, Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@...rix.com> wrote:
> > Change the function definitions of acpi_os_prepare_sleep() and
> > acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep() to pass along the new extended sleep
> > parameter.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@...rix.com>
> > Cc: Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>
> > Cc: Rafaell J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> > Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/osl.c   |   16 ++++++++--------
> >  include/linux/acpi.h |    6 +++---
> >  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c index
> > e721863..0251c9b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> > @@ -77,8 +77,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_in_debugger);  extern char
> > line_buf[80];
> >  #endif				/*ENABLE_DEBUGGER */
> >
> > -static int (*__acpi_os_prepare_sleep)(u8 sleep_state, u32 pm1a_ctrl,
> > -				      u32 pm1b_ctrl);
> > +static int (*__acpi_os_prepare_sleep)(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a, u32
> val_b,
> > +				      bool extended);
> 
> So from here till patch 5 the build will be half broken because of the
> type mismatches? I think at least the types of the consumers need to be
> changed in this patch; leaving the meat of the Xen change to patch 4 is
> perhaps fine.
> 
> Jan
> 
> >
> >  static acpi_osd_handler acpi_irq_handler;  static void
> > *acpi_irq_context; @@ -1757,13 +1757,13 @@ acpi_status
> > acpi_os_terminate(void)
> >  	return AE_OK;
> >  }
> >
> > -acpi_status acpi_os_prepare_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u32 pm1a_control,
> > -				  u32 pm1b_control)
> > +acpi_status acpi_os_prepare_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a, u32 val_b,
> > +				  u8 extended)
> >  {
> >  	int rc = 0;
> >  	if (__acpi_os_prepare_sleep)
> > -		rc = __acpi_os_prepare_sleep(sleep_state,
> > -					     pm1a_control, pm1b_control);
> > +		rc = __acpi_os_prepare_sleep(sleep_state, val_a, val_b,
> > +					     extended);
> >  	if (rc < 0)
> >  		return AE_ERROR;
> >  	else if (rc > 0)
> > @@ -1772,8 +1772,8 @@ acpi_status acpi_os_prepare_sleep(u8
> > sleep_state, u32 pm1a_control,
> >  	return AE_OK;
> >  }
> >
> > -void acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state,
> > -			       u32 pm1a_ctrl, u32 pm1b_ctrl))
> > +void acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a,
> > +			       u32 val_b, bool extended))
> >  {
> >  	__acpi_os_prepare_sleep = func;
> >  }
> > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h index
> > 709a2f2..26f9996 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > @@ -477,8 +477,8 @@ static inline bool acpi_driver_match_device(struct
> > device *dev,
> >  #endif	/* !CONFIG_ACPI */
> >
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > -void acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state,
> > -			       u32 pm1a_ctrl,  u32 pm1b_ctrl));
> > +void acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a,
> > +			       u32 val_b, bool extended));
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> >  void arch_reserve_mem_area(acpi_physical_address addr, size_t size);
> > #else @@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static inline void
> > arch_reserve_mem_area(acpi_physical_address addr,  }  #endif /*
> > CONFIG_X86 */  #else -#define acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(func,
> > pm1a_ctrl, pm1b_ctrl) do { } while
> > (0)
> > +#define acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(func, val_a, val_b, ext) do { }
> > +while (0)
> >  #endif
> >
> >  #if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME)
> > --
> > 1.7.9.5
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/