| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 19:49:29 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, arnd@...db.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
arm@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: irqchip: add support for MOXA ART SoCs
Hi Jonas,
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 03:29:33PM +0200, Jonas Jensen wrote:
> This patch adds an irqchip driver for the main interrupt controller found
> on MOXA ART SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@...il.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> Applies to next-20130619
>
> Changes since v2:
>
> 1. bail if irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips fails
> 2. remove separate function "moxart_alloc_gc", move all code to main init
> 3. if of_iomap fails, instead of panic, print error and return -EINVAL
> 4. use of_property_read_u32 instead of be32_to_cpup(of_get_property(..))
>
> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/irq-moxart.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 111 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-moxart.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> index cda4cb5..956d129 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> @@ -16,3 +16,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RENESAS_INTC_IRQPIN) += irq-renesas-intc-irqpin.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_RENESAS_IRQC) += irq-renesas-irqc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_VERSATILE_FPGA_IRQ) += irq-versatile-fpga.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_VT8500) += irq-vt8500.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MOXART) += irq-moxart.o
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-moxart.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-moxart.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..0815108
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-moxart.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
> +/*
> + * MOXA ART SoCs IRQ chip driver.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Jonas Jensen
> + *
> + * Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@...il.com>
> + *
> + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
> + * License version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any
> + * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/exception.h>
> +
> +#include "irqchip.h"
> +
> +#define IRQ_SOURCE_REG 0
> +#define IRQ_MASK_REG 0x04
> +#define IRQ_CLEAR_REG 0x08
> +#define IRQ_MODE_REG 0x0c
> +#define IRQ_LEVEL_REG 0x10
> +#define IRQ_STATUS_REG 0x14
> +
> +#define FIQ_SOURCE_REG 0x20
> +#define FIQ_MASK_REG 0x24
> +#define FIQ_CLEAR_REG 0x28
> +#define FIQ_MODE_REG 0x2c
> +#define FIQ_LEVEL_REG 0x30
> +#define FIQ_STATUS_REG 0x34
> +
> +static void __iomem *moxart_irq_base;
> +static struct irq_domain *moxart_irq_domain;
> +static unsigned int interrupt_mask;
I would pack this into a struct s.t. you have only one global variable
for the chip instance. More or less a matter of taste.
> +
> +asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry moxart_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
can this be static?
> +{
> + u32 irqstat;
> + int hwirq;
> +
> + irqstat = readl(moxart_irq_base + IRQ_STATUS_REG);
> +
> + while (irqstat) {
> + hwirq = ffs(irqstat) - 1;
> + handle_IRQ(irq_find_mapping(moxart_irq_domain, hwirq), regs);
Call irq_linear_revmap instead of irq_find_mapping.
> + irqstat &= ~(1 << hwirq);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int __init moxart_of_intc_init(struct device_node *node,
> + struct device_node *parent)
wrong indention.
> +{
> + unsigned int clr = IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE | IRQ_NOAUTOEN;
> + int ret;
> + struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "interrupt-mask", &interrupt_mask);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_err("%s: can't read interrupt-mask DT property\n",
> + node->full_name);
ditto
> + pr_debug("%s: interrupt-mask=%x\n", node->full_name, interrupt_mask);
> +
> + moxart_irq_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
> + if (!moxart_irq_base) {
> + pr_err("%s: unable to map INTC CPU registers\n",
> + node->full_name);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + moxart_irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, 32,
> + &irq_generic_chip_ops, moxart_irq_base);
if (!moxart_irq_domain) {
/* error handling */
}
> +
> + ret = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(moxart_irq_domain, 32, 1,
> + "MOXARTINTC", handle_edge_irq,
> + clr, 0, IRQ_GC_INIT_MASK_CACHE);
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("%s: could not allocate generic chip\n", __func__);
you should free moxart_irq_domain here.
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(moxart_irq_domain, 0);
> +
> + gc->reg_base = moxart_irq_base;
> + gc->chip_types[0].regs.mask = IRQ_MASK_REG;
> + gc->chip_types[0].regs.ack = IRQ_CLEAR_REG;
> + gc->chip_types[0].chip.irq_ack = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
> + gc->chip_types[0].chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit;
> + gc->chip_types[0].chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
> +
> + writel(0, moxart_irq_base + IRQ_MASK_REG);
> + writel(0xffffffff, moxart_irq_base + IRQ_CLEAR_REG);
> +
> + writel(interrupt_mask, moxart_irq_base + IRQ_MODE_REG);
> + writel(interrupt_mask, moxart_irq_base + IRQ_LEVEL_REG);
> +
> + set_handle_irq(moxart_handle_irq);
> +
> + pr_info("%s: %s finished\n", node->full_name, __func__);
"finished" looks like a debug message. IMHO either drop the message or
write something more useful.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(moxa_moxart_ic, "moxa,moxart-interrupt-controller",
> + moxart_of_intc_init);
> --
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists