linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 3/8] spi: spi-ep93xx: always handle transfer specific settings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 1 Jul 2013 13:15:40 -0500
From:	H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
	<spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>,
	"mika.westerberg@....fi" <mika.westerberg@....fi>,
	"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/8] spi: spi-ep93xx: always handle transfer specific
 settings

On Monday, July 01, 2013 3:28 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:43:34AM -0700, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> __spi_async(), which starts every SPI message transfer, initializes
>> the bits_per_word and max speed for every transfer in the message.
>> Since the conditional test in ep93xx_spi_process_transfer() will
>> always succeed just remove it and always call ep93xx_spi_chip_setup()
>> to configure the hardware for each transfer in the message.
>
> Applied, thanks.

Mark,

I was going to redo this series based on the comments I have received
so far. Did you already apply this one? Should I push it to the front of my
patchset?

Regards,
Hartley

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/