lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 02 Jul 2013 12:15:07 +0800
From:	Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Dong Fang <yp.fangdong@...il.com>
CC:	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: remove the unnecessrary code of fs/inode.c

On 07/01/2013 08:19 PM, Dong Fang wrote:

> These functions, such as find_inode_fast() and find_inode(), iget_lock() and
> iget5_lock(), insert_inode_locked() and insert_inode_locked4(), almost have
> the same code.

Maybe the title "[PATCH] vfs: remove the reduplicate code of fs/inode.c" is more
suitable.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Dong Fang <yp.fangdong@...il.com>


Reviewed-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>

Thanks,
Gu

> ---
>  fs/inode.c |  134 ++++++++++++------------------------------------------------
>  1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
> index 00d5fc3..847eee9 100644
> --- a/fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/inode.c
> @@ -790,6 +790,22 @@ void prune_icache_sb(struct super_block *sb, int nr_to_scan)
>  }
>  
>  static void __wait_on_freeing_inode(struct inode *inode);
> +
> +
> +static int test_ino(struct inode *inode, void *data)
> +{
> +	unsigned long ino = *(unsigned long *) data;
> +	return inode->i_ino == ino;

Can be more concise:
	return inode->i_ino == *(unsigned long *) data;
,so does the new insert_inode_locked():
	

> +}
> +
> +static int set_ino(struct inode *inode, void *data)
> +{
> +	inode->i_ino = *(unsigned long *) data;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
> +
>  /*
>   * Called with the inode lock held.
>   */
> @@ -829,28 +845,7 @@ repeat:
>  static struct inode *find_inode_fast(struct super_block *sb,
>  				struct hlist_head *head, unsigned long ino)
>  {
> -	struct inode *inode = NULL;
> -
> -repeat:
> -	hlist_for_each_entry(inode, head, i_hash) {
> -		spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> -		if (inode->i_ino != ino) {
> -			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> -			continue;
> -		}
> -		if (inode->i_sb != sb) {
> -			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> -			continue;
> -		}
> -		if (inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE)) {
> -			__wait_on_freeing_inode(inode);
> -			goto repeat;
> -		}
> -		__iget(inode);
> -		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> -		return inode;
> -	}
> -	return NULL;
> +	return find_inode(sb, head, test_ino, (void *)&ino);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1073,50 +1068,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(iget5_locked);
>   */
>  struct inode *iget_locked(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
>  {
> -	struct hlist_head *head = inode_hashtable + hash(sb, ino);
> -	struct inode *inode;
> -
> -	spin_lock(&inode_hash_lock);
> -	inode = find_inode_fast(sb, head, ino);
> -	spin_unlock(&inode_hash_lock);
> -	if (inode) {
> -		wait_on_inode(inode);
> -		return inode;
> -	}
> -
> -	inode = alloc_inode(sb);
> -	if (inode) {
> -		struct inode *old;
> -
> -		spin_lock(&inode_hash_lock);
> -		/* We released the lock, so.. */
> -		old = find_inode_fast(sb, head, ino);
> -		if (!old) {
> -			inode->i_ino = ino;
> -			spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> -			inode->i_state = I_NEW;
> -			hlist_add_head(&inode->i_hash, head);
> -			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> -			inode_sb_list_add(inode);
> -			spin_unlock(&inode_hash_lock);
> -
> -			/* Return the locked inode with I_NEW set, the
> -			 * caller is responsible for filling in the contents
> -			 */
> -			return inode;
> -		}
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * Uhhuh, somebody else created the same inode under
> -		 * us. Use the old inode instead of the one we just
> -		 * allocated.
> -		 */
> -		spin_unlock(&inode_hash_lock);
> -		destroy_inode(inode);
> -		inode = old;
> -		wait_on_inode(inode);
> -	}
> -	return inode;
> +	return iget5_locked(sb, ino, test_ino, set_ino, (void *)&ino);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(iget_locked);
>  
> @@ -1281,48 +1233,6 @@ struct inode *ilookup(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(ilookup);
>  
> -int insert_inode_locked(struct inode *inode)
> -{
> -	struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
> -	ino_t ino = inode->i_ino;
> -	struct hlist_head *head = inode_hashtable + hash(sb, ino);
> -
> -	while (1) {
> -		struct inode *old = NULL;
> -		spin_lock(&inode_hash_lock);
> -		hlist_for_each_entry(old, head, i_hash) {
> -			if (old->i_ino != ino)
> -				continue;
> -			if (old->i_sb != sb)
> -				continue;
> -			spin_lock(&old->i_lock);
> -			if (old->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE)) {
> -				spin_unlock(&old->i_lock);
> -				continue;
> -			}
> -			break;
> -		}
> -		if (likely(!old)) {
> -			spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> -			inode->i_state |= I_NEW;
> -			hlist_add_head(&inode->i_hash, head);
> -			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> -			spin_unlock(&inode_hash_lock);
> -			return 0;
> -		}
> -		__iget(old);
> -		spin_unlock(&old->i_lock);
> -		spin_unlock(&inode_hash_lock);
> -		wait_on_inode(old);
> -		if (unlikely(!inode_unhashed(old))) {
> -			iput(old);
> -			return -EBUSY;
> -		}
> -		iput(old);
> -	}
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(insert_inode_locked);
> -
>  int insert_inode_locked4(struct inode *inode, unsigned long hashval,
>  		int (*test)(struct inode *, void *), void *data)
>  {
> @@ -1366,6 +1276,14 @@ int insert_inode_locked4(struct inode *inode, unsigned long hashval,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(insert_inode_locked4);
>  
> +int insert_inode_locked(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	unsigned long ino = inode->i_ino;
> +	return insert_inode_locked4(inode, ino, test_ino, (void *)&ino);

return insert_inode_locked4(inode, inode->i_ino, test_ino, (void *)&ino);

> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(insert_inode_locked);
> +
> +
>  
>  int generic_delete_inode(struct inode *inode)
>  {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ