linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Fix assorted FS-Cache issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Jul 2013 11:49:56 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-cachefs@...hat.com,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	milosz@...in.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Fix assorted FS-Cache issues

On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 01:12:13 +0100 David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> > >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git tags/fscache-20130702
> > 
> > /me wonders where this has been hiding for the last month and a half ...
> 
> I asked you to pull my fscache branch on the 23rd May, and you replied on the
> 27th May saying you'd done so.

And in linux-next, I keep fetching the same branch every day to get
updates.  It is polite (in fact necessary) for you to keep that branch up
to date if you change things.  You did not update that branch until today
which is what confused me.  The *commits* you sent Linus have never been
in linux-next even though the *patches* have.

Not a biggie, just makes it a bit hard to keep track.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped