[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 19:41:54 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/slab: Sharing s_next and s_stop between slab and slub
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013, David Rientjes wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>
>> > This patch shares s_next and s_stop between slab and slub.
>> >
>>
>> Just about the entire kernel includes slab.h, so I think you'll need to
>> give these slab-specific names instead of exporting "s_next" and "s_stop"
>> to everybody.
>
> He put the export into mm/slab.h. The headerfile is only included by
> mm/sl?b.c .
But he then went on to add globally visible symbols "s_next" and
"s_stop" which is bad...
Please send me an incremental patch on top of slab/next to fix this
up. Otherwise I'll revert it before sending a pull request to Linus.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists