linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Fix boolean for NO_LIBPYTHON=1 NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 8 Jul 2013 12:18:10 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Fix boolean for NO_LIBPYTHON=1 NO_LIBPERL=1
 build

Em Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 03:55:39PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> The build is broken for 'NO_LIBPYTHON=1 NO_LIBPERL=1' switches.
> 
> The reason is that without perl and python support we
> dont have TRUE/FALSE macro definitions in dso and vdso
> objects (added there by commit 7821317).
> 
> Using stdbool.h defines instead which seems to be more
> common in perf code anyway.

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/