linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net 1/2] tuntap: correctly linearize skb when zerocopy is used

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:34:52 +0300
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] tuntap: correctly linearize skb when zerocopy is
 used

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:10:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Userspace may produce vectors greater than MAX_SKB_FRAGS. When we try to
> linearize parts of the skb to let the rest of iov to be fit in
> the frags, we need count copylen into linear when calling tun_alloc_skb()
> instead of partly counting it into data_len. Since this breaks
> zerocopy_sg_from_iovec() since its inner counter assumes nr_frags should
> be zero at beginning. This cause nr_frags to be increased wrongly without
> setting the correct frags.
> 
> This bug were introduced from 0690899b4d4501b3505be069b9a687e68ccbe15b
> (tun: experimental zero copy tx support)
> 
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> ---
> This patch is needed for stable.
> ---
>  drivers/net/tun.c |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index 7eab5fc..01d5a86 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -1109,7 +1109,8 @@ static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
>  	} else
>  		copylen = len;
>  
> -	skb = tun_alloc_skb(tfile, align, copylen, gso.hdr_len, noblock);
> +	skb = tun_alloc_skb(tfile, align, copylen,
> +			    zerocopy ? copylen : gso.hdr_len, noblock);
>  	if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
>  		if (PTR_ERR(skb) != -EAGAIN)
>  			tun->dev->stats.rx_dropped++;

Good catch, thanks. But let's add a new variable and
set it in the if statement above
instead of an extra branch here - not for performance but
because it's clearer this way.

> -- 
> 1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/