linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add phy support for AM335X platform using Generic PHy framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 9 Jul 2013 17:05:59 +0530
From:	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To:	George Cherian <george.cherian@...com>
CC:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <balbi@...com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add phy support for AM335X platform using Generic
 PHy framework

Hi,

On Tuesday 09 July 2013 11:10 AM, George Cherian wrote:
> On 7/9/2013 1:14 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> On 07/08/2013 12:43 PM, George Cherian wrote:
>>> This patch series adds phy support for AM335X platform.
>>> This patch series is based on Generic PHY framework [1].
>>>
>>>
>>> This series has
>>>     - adds dual musb instances support for am335x platform (just for testing)
>>>     - adds phy-amxxxx-usb driver used in AMxxxx platforms
>>>     - adds dt  bindings for the phys
>>>     - removes usb-phy and replaced with generic phy apis in glue layer
>> No, I don't like this all. You did the one thing I tried to avoid while
>> posting my quick-and-dirty phy driver recently: You duplicated a lot of
>> code which can be served by the nop driver and added only power
>> on/power off callbacks.
> I wanted to add phy wakeup control also, but currently phy_ops  dont have an op
> for wkup_ctrl
> Kishon, Can we add one?

Since this should be a capability of the PHY, can't we have wkup_ctrl always
enabled if the PHY has such a capability? or if it needs more user control,
should we implement a sysfs entry to enable wakeup?

Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/