linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] perf tools: Make Power7 events available for perf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:34:35 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
	Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>,
	Runzhen Wang <runzhen@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	paulus@...ba.org, acme@...hat.com,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] perf tools: Make Power7 events available for perf


* Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 10:14:34AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:24:34PM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > > 
> > > So something like they have on ARM?
> > > 
> > > vince@...daboard:/sys/bus/event_source/devices$ ls -l
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul  8 21:57 ARMv7 Cortex-A9 -> ../../../devices/ARMv7 Cortex-A9
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul  8 21:57 breakpoint -> ../../../devices/breakpoint
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul  8 21:57 software -> ../../../devices/software
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul  8 21:57 tracepoint -> ../../../devices/tracepoint
> > 
> > Right so what I remember of the ARM case is that their /proc/cpuinfo isn't
> > sufficient to identify their PMU. And they don't have a cpuid like instruction
> > at all.
> > 
> > > > For the cpu you can obviously just detect what processor you're on with
> > > > cpuid or whatever, but it's a bit of a hack. And that really doesn't
> > > > work for non-cpu PMUs.
> > > 
> > > why is it a hack to use cpuid?
> > 
> > I agree, for x86 cpuid is perfectly fine, as would /proc/cpuinfo be, I suspect
> > that just the model number is sufficient in most cases, even for uncore stuff.
>  
> What about things on PCI? Other strange buses?
> 
> As long as everything's in /sys then it should be _possible_ for 
> userspace to work out what's what, but it's going to end up with a bunch 
> of detection logic and heuristics in the library.
> 
> At which point you've just rewritten libpfm4.

Exactly - PMUs enumerated in /sys should be self-identifying, it's a 
hardware topology after all ...

Anytime userspace is forced to look into /proc, or into weird places in 
/sys it's a FAIL really.

perf ABIs want to be self-identifying and self-sufficient, anytime 
userspace is forced to look elsewhere it adds another source of fragility.

And duplication with something that is 'already in /proc' is not a problem 
_at all_, these are computers that provide us different views into the 
same physical reality with dozens of different abstractions, so 
duplication of information is natural and _good_.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/