linux-kernel - [RESEND] The initmpfs patches.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 09 Jul 2013 21:06:39 -0500
From:	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RESEND] The initmpfs patches.

Attached, so you don't have to fish them out of:

   http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1306.3/04204.html

Do they look worth applying, or should I wash it through linux-next for  
a bit? (Which I'm not sure how to do if I don't host a git tree on a  
server, or I'd have done it already.)

There was a previous post with a patch demonstrating the basic concept  
a while ago (https://lwn.net/Articles/545740/). This is the cleaned up,  
broken up, tested in as many ways as I could think of, does not have  
section mismatches, allows you to disable it at runtime, passes  
checkpatch.pl version. Still applies to a git pull from 3 minutes ago  
(two patches have offsets, but no fuzz).

Thanks,

Rob
View attachment "00.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1213 bytes)

View attachment "01.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1129 bytes)

View attachment "02.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1791 bytes)

View attachment "03.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (4729 bytes)

View attachment "04.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (2039 bytes)

View attachment "05.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1714 bytes)