linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: rebase of the jdelvare-hwmon quilt series

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Jul 2013 07:57:00 +0200
From:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: rebase of the jdelvare-hwmon quilt series

Hi Stephen,

On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:27:24 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Why have you just rebased the jdelvare-hwmon series
> (http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/linux-3/jdelvare-hwmon/)?  You have
> just invalidated your testing and made it likely that Linus will blast
> you if you ask him to pull your patches.  Your whole series was already
> based after v3.10 (i.e. released or rebased after the merge window
> opened), so why move it again?

I'm quite confused by this complaint of yours. I do not have the
feeling that I rebased anything or invalidated any testing. And I don't
think I did anything different this time from the way I have been
proceeding for years.

I had only 2 hwmon patches for Linus for this merge window:
  hwmon-lm63-drop-redundant-safety.patch
  hwmon-lm90-drop-redundant-safety.patch

They have been in
http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/linux-3/jdelvare-hwmon/ (and thus in
linux-next) continuously since May 19th so I'd say they received pretty
good testing. I did not touch them, I did not even have to refresh them.

3 days ago I added these 2 patches to the hwmon-for-linus branch of my
staging tree:
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jdelvare/staging.git/log/?h=hwmon-for-linus
and asked Linux to pull from it.

Yesterday I reviewed a new (trivial) hwmon patch, and I accepted it, so
it was added to http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/linux-3/jdelvare-hwmon/ as 
hwmon-w83792d-update-module-author.patch (and thus went to linux-next.)

Last night Linus pulled from
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jdelvare/staging.git/log/?h=hwmon-for-linus
so the 2 "old" patches are now merged upstream. The one "new" patch
is not, it will get upstream next time I ask Linus to pull from my
staging tree.

This is how things have happened, and I just can't see anything wrong.
If you do, please explain what you thing shouldn't have happened, and
let me know what I should have done instead.

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/