linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix cpufreq regression after suspend/resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:43:40 +0530
From:	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
CC:	Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix cpufreq regression after suspend/resume

On 07/13/2013 06:22 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-07-13 at 12:16 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> I suspect that the stuck frequency is a regression introduced in v3.10.0.
> 
> The culprit apparently is commit a66b2e503f ("cpufreq: Preserve sysfs
> files across suspend/resume"). Srivatsa submitted a patch to revert that
> commit (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/11/661 ). That revert seems to
> fix this issue too.
> 
>

Thanks a lot for your tests and for confirming that the complete revert
fixes your cpufreq issue.
 
 
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/