linux-kernel - RE: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] Maybe it's time to shut this thread down (Was: Re: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Jul 2013 21:02:02 +0000
From:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:	Daniel Phillips <d.phillips@...tner.samsung.com>,
	Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
	<ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] Maybe it's time to shut this thread down
 (Was: Re: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review)

On 07/18/2013 03:54 PM, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> Let's shift this discussion away from the terms "abuse" and
> "professionalism" to "respect" and "civility".

And Daniel Philips replied:
> Brilliant, and +1 for a session at KS. In the mean time, why don't we 
> all try to demonstrate the real meaning of respect and civility, by 
> practising it henceforth on LKML

+1 from me too. Using the right terms will help us have a discussion that
focusses on the issues that matter - and avoid getting side-tracked by
things that don't.

Some thoughts on the format of the discussion at KS:

1) Keep it real
    We could come up with hypothetical scenarios on what things people *might* say, and
    how you *might* react and talk for days.  Let's stick to things that actually happened.
    (people's feelings/emotions on seeing specific posts count as "actually happened" for
     this - even if they didn't post a reply ... perhaps especially if they didn't post).
2) Keep it personal
    An extension of keeping it real - none of us represents the thoughts and opinions of
    *every* other developer with whom we share some attribute.  Sarah doesn't speak
    for all young cool programmers any more than I speak for all old uncool ones :-). So stick
    to your own stories, or those of specific people that can't be at KS but ask for their
    tales to be told. [Not sure how well I expressed this one ... I'm trying to avoid the
    issue where someone gets fired up with indignation on behalf of someone else ... who
    isn't actually bothered by whatever happened].
3) Don't bring up ancient history
    From the discussions on this, it looks like many people believe that things are better
    than they were just a few years ago.  Unless someone has the desire to do some
    month-by-month survey and disproves this perception - let's pretend we have a
    one or two year statute of limitations and not keep feuds going for (internet) generations.
4) Perfect is the enemy of good
    Or "You can't please all of the people all of the time". No matter what we do there
    will still be some unhappy people. Life is like that. But we can almost certainly
    make more of the people happier for most of the time. So our goal isn't to solve
    every possible problem (we need to save some topics for future KS :-) we just
    want to make things better than they are, while still allowing for criticism of code.
 
-Tony

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/