linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix refcount leak in tty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:11:47 -0400
From:	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To:	Gianluca Anzolin <gianluca@...tospazio.it>,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
CC:	Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jslaby@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix refcount leak in tty_port.c

On 07/12/2013 10:04 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 07/12/2013 06:30 AM, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
>> Hi Gianluca,
>>
>> * Gianluca Anzolin <gianluca@...tospazio.it> [2013-07-09 10:35:35 +0200]:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> In linux 3.10 in the file drivers/tty/tty_port.c the function
>>> tty_port_tty_hangup may leak a tty reference:
>>>
>>>          struct tty_struct *tty = tty_port_tty_get(port);
>>>
>>>          if (tty && (!check_clocal || !C_CLOCAL(tty))) {
>>>                  tty_hangup(tty);
>>>                  tty_kref_put(tty);
>>>          }
>>>
>>> If tty != NULL and the second condition is false we never call tty_kref_put and
>>> the reference is leaked.
>
> Good catch.
>
>>> Fix by nesting two if statements.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gianluca Anzolin <gianluca@...tospazio.it>
>>
>> As mentioned by Gianluca this is a regression of aa27a094 and we depend on
>> this patch to go ahead with some fixes in the bluetooth subsystem.
>
> Gustavo,
>
> There's no direct dependency; ie., there aren't merge issues here.
> We should progress with the fixes to rfcomm independent of this patch.
>
>> Gianluca, it might help if you send a proper git inline formated patch,
>> mentioning the issue and which regression you are fixing.  It makes
>> maintainer's life easier.
>
> As Gustavo points out, please inline the patch otherwise commenters
> have to do it for you.

Gianluca,

I think Greg may be expecting you to address the comments from myself
and Gustavo before accepting this patch.

Greg, is that the case?

Regards,
Peter Hurley

>> Also add my Ack to the patch:
>  >
>>
>> Acked-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>
>>
>>     Gustavo
>
> Copy of the Gianluca's patch with my comments
>
> --- %< ---
>
> Please put a proper commit message here, including that this is
> a regression and the commit id that caused the regression so this patch
> can eventually make its way to stable.
>
>
>  > diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_port.c b/drivers/tty/tty_port.c
>  > index 121aeb9..2198f7d 100644
>  > --- a/drivers/tty/tty_port.c
>  > +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_port.c
>  > @@ -256,8 +256,9 @@ void tty_port_tty_hangup(struct tty_port *port, bool check_clocal)
>  >  {
>  >      struct tty_struct *tty = tty_port_tty_get(port);
>  >
>  > -    if (tty && (!check_clocal || !C_CLOCAL(tty))) {
>  > -        tty_hangup(tty);
>  > +    if (tty) {
>  > +        if (!check_clocal || !C_CLOCAL(tty))
>  > +            tty_hangup(tty);
>  >          tty_kref_put(tty);
>  >      }
>  >  }
>
>
> tty_kref_put() already checks for NULL tty. I would prefer:
>
> {
>        struct tty_struct *tty = tty_port_tty_get(port);
>
>      if (tty && (!check_clocal || !C_CLOCAL(tty)))
>          tty_hangup(tty);
>      tty_kref_put(tty);
> }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/