linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 18/21] x86, numa: Synchronize nid info in memblock.reserve with numa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:00:19 +0800
From:	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, trenn@...e.de, yinghai@...nel.org,
	jiang.liu@...wei.com, wency@...fujitsu.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
	isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com,
	mgorman@...e.de, minchan@...nel.org, mina86@...a86.com,
	gong.chen@...ux.intel.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@...fitbricks.com,
	lwoodman@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com, jweiner@...hat.com,
	prarit@...hat.com, zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com,
	yanghy@...fujitsu.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/21] x86, numa: Synchronize nid info in memblock.reserve
 with numa_meminfo.

On 07/25/2013 11:05 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Tang.
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:09:29PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
>> And as in [patch 14/21], when reserving hotpluggable memory, we use
>> pxm. So my
>
> Which is kinda nasty.

Yes, will remove it.

>
>> idea was to do a nid sync in numa_init(). After this, memblock will
>> set nid when
>> it allocates memory.
>
> Sure, that's the only place we can set the numa node IDs but my point
> is that you don't need to add another interface.  Jet let
> memblock_set_node() handle both memblock.memory and .reserved ranges.
> That way, you can make memblock simpler to use and less error-prone.

Yes, I missed the isolation phase in memblock_set_node().
So followed.

>
>> If we want to let memblock_set_node() and alloc functions set nid on
>> the reserved
>> regions, we should setup nid<->  pxm mapping when we parst SRAT for
>> the first time.
>
> I don't follow why it has to be different.  Why do you need to do
> anything differently?  What am I missing here?

No, it was me who missed the isolation phase in memblock_set_node().

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/