linux-kernel - Re: [ 00/45] 3.0.88-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 27 Jul 2013 18:31:43 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
CC:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ 00/45] 3.0.88-stable review

On 07/27/2013 04:30 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 06:22 -0500, linux@...ck-us.net wrote:
>> Quoting Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>:
>>
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.88 release.
>>> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Sun Jul 28 20:54:53 UTC 2013.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>> 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.88-rc1.gz
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>> We have additional build failures.
>>
>> Total builds: 54 Total build errors: 20
>>
>> Link:
>> http://desktop.roeck-us.net/buildlogs/v3.0.87-45-g367423c.2013-07-27.03:09:16
>>
>> Previously:
>> Total builds: 54 Total build errors: 17
>>
>> Additional failures are i386/allmodconfig, i386/allyesconfig and mips/malta.
>>
>> I don't have time to track down the culprit tonight (I am still in
>> Down Under ;). I hope I can do it tomorrow.
> I iterated through the 3.0 patch queue with i386/allmodconfig, and got
> to:
>
> Applying patch ifb-fix-rcu_sched-self-detected-stalls.patch
> patching file drivers/net/ifb.c
>
> Now at patch ifb-fix-rcu_sched-self-detected-stalls.patch
>    CHK     include/linux/version.h
>    CHK     include/generated/utsrelease.h
>    CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
>    CHK     include/generated/compile.h
>    VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-int80-syms.lds
>    VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-sysenter-syms.lds
>    VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-syms.lds
>    LD      arch/x86/vdso/built-in.o
>    LD      arch/x86/built-in.o
>    CC [M]  drivers/net/ifb.o
> drivers/net/ifb.c: In function ‘ifb_init_module’:
> drivers/net/ifb.c:257:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cond_resched’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[2]: *** [drivers/net/ifb.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make: *** [drivers] Error 2
>
> I think this patch needs to add a '#include <linux/sched.h>', but that
> header is being included indirectly in some other configurations (and in
> mainline).
>
> With that change, I can apply the remaining patches and compile
> 3.0.88-rc1 successfully.
>
> Ben.
>
Yes, that is what I found as well.

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/