| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 15:32:16 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
indou.takao@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] pci: Add slot and bus reset interfaces
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 17:22 -0400, Don Dutile wrote:
> On 08/01/2013 12:55 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > Sometimes pci_reset_function is not sufficient. We have cases where
> > devices do not support any kind of reset, but there might be multiple
> > functions on the bus preventing pci_reset_function from doing a
> > secondary bus reset. We also have cases where a device will advertise
> > that it supports a PM reset, but really does nothing on D3hot->D0
> > (graphics cards are notorious for this). These devices often also
> > have more than one function, so even blacklisting PM reset for them
> > wouldn't allow a secondary bus reset through pci_reset_function.
> >
> > If a driver supports multiple devices it should have the ability to
> > induce a bus reset when it needs to. This patch provides that ability
> > through pci_reset_slot and pci_reset_bus. It's the caller's
> > responsibility when using these interfaces to understand that all of
> > the devices in or below the slot (or on or below the bus) will be
> > reset and therefore should be under control of the caller. PCI state
> > of all the affected devices is saved and restored around these resets,
> > but internal state of all of the affected devices is reset (which
> > should be the intention).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson<alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/pci.c | 195 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/pci.h | 2 +
> > 2 files changed, 197 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > index f6c757a..91f7bc4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > @@ -3518,6 +3518,201 @@ int pci_reset_function(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_reset_function);
> >
> > +static void pci_bus_lock(struct pci_bus *bus)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *dev;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(dev,&bus->devices, bus_list) {
> > + pci_dev_lock(dev);
> > + if (dev->subordinate)
> > + pci_bus_lock(dev->subordinate);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void pci_bus_unlock(struct pci_bus *bus)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *dev;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(dev,&bus->devices, bus_list) {
> > + pci_dev_unlock(dev);
> > + if (dev->subordinate)
> > + pci_bus_unlock(dev->subordinate);
> > + }
> > +}
> So, I'm wondering if the above locks from top of PCI tree down,
> should the unlock work from bottom back to the top ?
> i.e.,
> list_for_each_entry(dev,&bus->devices, bus_list) {
> if (dev->subordinate)
> pci_bus_unlock(dev->subordinate);
> pci_dev_unlock(dev);
> }
I hadn't considered that, it does seem like a good idea though.
> > +static void pci_slot_lock(struct pci_slot *slot)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *dev;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(dev,&slot->bus->devices, bus_list) {
> > + if (!dev->slot || dev->slot != slot)
> > + continue;
> > + pci_dev_lock(dev);
> > + if (dev->subordinate)
> > + pci_bus_lock(dev->subordinate);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void pci_slot_unlock(struct pci_slot *slot)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *dev;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(dev,&slot->bus->devices, bus_list) {
> > + if (!dev->slot || dev->slot != slot)
> > + continue;
> > + pci_dev_unlock(dev);
> > + if (dev->subordinate)
> > + pci_bus_unlock(dev->subordinate);
> > + }
> > +}
> ditto.
>
> > +
> > +static void pci_bus_save_and_disable(struct pci_bus *bus)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *dev;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(dev,&bus->devices, bus_list) {
> > + pci_dev_save_and_disable(dev);
> > + if (dev->subordinate)
> > + pci_bus_save_and_disable(dev->subordinate);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void pci_bus_restore(struct pci_bus *bus)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *dev;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(dev,&bus->devices, bus_list) {
> > + pci_dev_restore(dev);
> > + if (dev->subordinate)
> > + pci_bus_restore(dev->subordinate);
> > + }
> > +}
> but not in reverse here, b/c need top-most device restored
> to get to next level in PCI tree (since could be a PPB that needs
> restoring to get to next level bus/device(s)).
Right. Thanks, I'll see if there are any more comments and respin.
Alex
> > +
> > +static void pci_slot_save_and_disable(struct pci_slot *slot)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *dev;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(dev,&slot->bus->devices, bus_list) {
> > + if (!dev->slot || dev->slot != slot)
> > + continue;
> > + pci_dev_save_and_disable(dev);
> > + if (dev->subordinate)
> > + pci_bus_save_and_disable(dev->subordinate);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void pci_slot_restore(struct pci_slot *slot)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *dev;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(dev,&slot->bus->devices, bus_list) {
> > + if (!dev->slot || dev->slot != slot)
> > + continue;
> > + pci_dev_restore(dev);
> > + if (dev->subordinate)
> > + pci_bus_restore(dev->subordinate);
> > + }
> > +}
> ditto.
>
> > +
> > +static int pci_slot_reset(struct pci_slot *slot, int probe)
> > +{
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + if (!slot)
> > + return -ENOTTY;
> > +
> > + if (!probe)
> > + pci_slot_lock(slot);
> > +
> > + might_sleep();
> > +
> > + rc = pci_reset_hotplug_slot(slot->hotplug, probe);
> > +
> > + if (!probe)
> > + pci_slot_unlock(slot);
> > +
> > + return rc;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * pci_reset_slot - reset a PCI slot
> > + * @slot: PCI slot to reset
> > + *
> > + * A PCI bus may host multiple slots, each slot may support a reset mechanism
> > + * independent of other slots. For instance, some slots may support slot power
> > + * control. In the case of a 1:1 bus to slot architecture, this function may
> > + * wrap the bus reset to avoid spurious slot related events such as hotplug.
> > + * Generally a slot reset should be attempted before a bus reset. All of the
> > + * function of the slot and any subordinate buses behind the slot are reset
> > + * through this function. PCI config space of all devices in the slot and
> > + * behind the slot is saved before and restored after reset.
> > + *
> > + * Return 0 on success, non-zero on error.
> > + */
> > +int pci_reset_slot(struct pci_slot *slot)
> > +{
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + rc = pci_slot_reset(slot, 1);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > +
> > + pci_slot_save_and_disable(slot);
> > +
> > + rc = pci_slot_reset(slot, 0);
> > +
> > + pci_slot_restore(slot);
> > +
> > + return rc;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_reset_slot);
> > +
> > +static int pci_bus_reset(struct pci_bus *bus, int probe)
> > +{
> > + if (!bus->self)
> > + return -ENOTTY;
> > +
> > + if (probe)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + pci_bus_lock(bus);
> > +
> > + might_sleep();
> > +
> > + pci_reset_bridge_secondary_bus(bus->self);
> > +
> > + pci_bus_unlock(bus);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * pci_reset_bus - reset a PCI bus
> > + * @bus: top level PCI bus to reset
> > + *
> > + * Do a bus reset on the given bus and any subordinate buses, saving
> > + * and restoring state of all devices.
> > + *
> > + * Return 0 on success, non-zero on error.
> > + */
> > +int pci_reset_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> > +{
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + rc = pci_bus_reset(bus, 1);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > +
> > + pci_bus_save_and_disable(bus);
> > +
> > + rc = pci_bus_reset(bus, 0);
> > +
> > + pci_bus_restore(bus);
> > +
> > + return rc;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_reset_bus);
> > +
> > /**
> > * pcix_get_max_mmrbc - get PCI-X maximum designed memory read byte count
> > * @dev: PCI device to query
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> > index 35c1bc4..1a8fd34 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> > @@ -924,6 +924,8 @@ int pcie_set_mps(struct pci_dev *dev, int mps);
> > int __pci_reset_function(struct pci_dev *dev);
> > int __pci_reset_function_locked(struct pci_dev *dev);
> > int pci_reset_function(struct pci_dev *dev);
> > +int pci_reset_slot(struct pci_slot *slot);
> > +int pci_reset_bus(struct pci_bus *bus);
> > void pci_reset_bridge_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev);
> > void pci_update_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno);
> > int __must_check pci_assign_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int i);
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists