| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 21:52:31 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: acme@...stprotocols.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf: sample after exit loses thread correlation - v3
Occassionally events (e.g., context-switch, sched tracepoints) are losing
the conversion of sample data associated with a thread. For example:
$ perf record -e sched:sched_switch -c 1 -a -- sleep 5
$ perf script
<selected events shown>
ls 30482 [000] 1379727.583037: sched:sched_switch: prev_comm=ls prev_pid=30482 ...
ls 30482 [000] 1379727.586339: sched:sched_switch: prev_comm=ls prev_pid=30482 ...
:30482 30482 [000] 1379727.589462: sched:sched_switch: prev_comm=ls prev_pid=30482 ...
The last line lost the conversion from tid to comm. If you look at the events
(perf script -D) you see why - SAMPLE event is generated after the EXIT:
0 1379727589449774 0x1540b0 [0x38]: PERF_RECORD_EXIT(30482:30482):(30482:30482)
0 1379727589462497 0x1540e8 [0x80]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 1): 30482/30482: 0xffffffff816416f1 period: 1 addr: 0
... thread: :30482:30482
When perf processes the EXIT event the thread is moved to the dead_threads
list. When the SAMPLE event is processed no thread exists for the pid so a new
one is created by machine__findnew_thread.
This patch address the problem by delaying the move to the dead_threads list
until the tid is re-used (per Adrian's suggestion).
With this patch we get the previous example shows:
ls 30482 [000] 1379727.583037: sched:sched_switch: prev_comm=ls prev_pid=30482 ...
ls 30482 [000] 1379727.586339: sched:sched_switch: prev_comm=ls prev_pid=30482 ...
ls 30482 [000] 1379727.589462: sched:sched_switch: prev_comm=ls prev_pid=30482 ...
and
0 1379727589449774 0x1540b0 [0x38]: PERF_RECORD_EXIT(30482:30482):(30482:30482)
0 1379727589462497 0x1540e8 [0x80]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 1): 30482/30482: 0xffffffff816416f1 period: 1 addr: 0
... thread: ls:30482
v3: re-do from a time based check to a delayed move to dead_threads list
v2: Rebased to latest perf/core branch. Changed time comparison to use
a macro which explicitly shows the time basis
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
---
tools/perf/util/machine.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
index f9f9d63..0d29b1b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
@@ -994,11 +994,27 @@ out_problem:
return 0;
}
+static void machine__remove_thread(struct machine *machine, struct thread *th)
+{
+ machine->last_match = NULL;
+ rb_erase(&th->rb_node, &machine->threads);
+ /*
+ * We may have references to this thread, for instance in some hist_entry
+ * instances, so just move them to a separate list.
+ */
+ list_add_tail(&th->node, &machine->dead_threads);
+}
+
int machine__process_fork_event(struct machine *machine, union perf_event *event)
{
- struct thread *thread = machine__findnew_thread(machine, event->fork.tid);
+ struct thread *thread = machine__find_thread(machine, event->fork.tid);
struct thread *parent = machine__findnew_thread(machine, event->fork.ptid);
+ /* if a thread currently exists for the thread id remove it */
+ if (thread != NULL)
+ machine__remove_thread(machine, thread);
+
+ thread = machine__findnew_thread(machine, event->fork.tid);
if (dump_trace)
perf_event__fprintf_task(event, stdout);
@@ -1011,27 +1027,12 @@ int machine__process_fork_event(struct machine *machine, union perf_event *event
return 0;
}
-static void machine__remove_thread(struct machine *machine, struct thread *th)
-{
- machine->last_match = NULL;
- rb_erase(&th->rb_node, &machine->threads);
- /*
- * We may have references to this thread, for instance in some hist_entry
- * instances, so just move them to a separate list.
- */
- list_add_tail(&th->node, &machine->dead_threads);
-}
-
-int machine__process_exit_event(struct machine *machine, union perf_event *event)
+int machine__process_exit_event(struct machine *machine __maybe_unused,
+ union perf_event *event)
{
- struct thread *thread = machine__find_thread(machine, event->fork.tid);
-
if (dump_trace)
perf_event__fprintf_task(event, stdout);
- if (thread != NULL)
- machine__remove_thread(machine, thread);
-
return 0;
}
--
1.7.10.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists