linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] ARM: at91/dt: make use of periph id macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 02 Aug 2013 11:04:52 +0200
From:	boris brezillon <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>
To:	Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
CC:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] ARM: at91/dt: make use of periph id macros

Hello Richard,

On 01/08/2013 09:37, Richard Genoud wrote:
> 2013/8/1 Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This patch series move at91 SoCs peripheral id definitions from machine
>> specific include dir to dt-bindings include dir.
>> These macros are used to reference interrupts instead of peripheral numbers.
>>
>> This makes dt definitions cleaner and easier to debug (one can easily tell if
>> the peripheral macro used to reference an interrupt line is not the good one).
>>
>> These macros will be used for clk definitions and references too.
>>
>> I am not sure 'include/dt-bindings/at91/xxx' is the best place to put these
>> definitions as there are no soc specific directories in dt-bindings include
>> dir right now. Maybe something like 'include/dt-bindings/soc/at91/xxx' or
>> 'include/dt-bindings/peripherals/at91/xxx' would be better.
>> What do you think ?
> Well, I'd rather use "atmel" than "at91" because, AFAIK, this prefix
> has been dropped for new atmel SoCs (sama5 for instance).

Should I do the same for at91 clk series (replace drivers/clk/at91 directory
by drivers/clk/atmel and include/linux/clk/at91_pmc.h by
include/linux/clk/atmel_pmc.h) ?

>
> my 2 cents...
>
> Richard.

Best Regards,

Boris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/