lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 2 Aug 2013 17:05:37 +0300
From:	Tuomas Tynkkynen <ttynkkynen@...dia.com>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC:	<balbi@...com>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] usb: phy: tegra: Program new PHY parameters

On 08/02/2013 12:16 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/31/2013 11:42 AM, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote:
>> The Tegra30 TRM recommends configuration of certain PHY parameters for
>> optimal quality. Program the following registers based on device tree
>> parameters:
>>
>> - UTMIP_XCVR_HSSLEW: HS slew rate control.
>> - UTMIP_HSSQUELCH_LEVEL: HS squelch detector level
>> - UTMIP_HSDISCON_LEVEL: HS disconnect detector level.
>>
>> These registers exist in Tegra20, but programming them hasn't been
>> necessary, so these parameters won't be set on Tegra20 to keep the
>> device trees backward compatible.
>>
>> Additionally, the UTMIP_XCVR_SETUP parameter can be set from fuses
>> instead of a software-programmed value, as the optimal value can
>> vary between invidual boards. The boolean property
>> nvidia,xcvr-setup-use-fuses can be used to enable this behaviour.
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-tegra-usb.c b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-tegra-usb.c

> Those two chunks end up clearing some fields in the register now even on
> earlier chips, whereas before their values were maintained when doing
> the read/modify/write. Yet, the commit description says the new fields
> aren't changed on Tegra20. Do the changes above need to be guarded by if
> (requires_extra_tuning_parameters)?

Oops, you are right. I overlooked that some of those fields have non-zero reset values.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ