| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 12:36:25 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com> To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> CC: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> Subject: Re: [RFC v01 0/3] Power Capping Framework On 8/2/2013 5:53 PM, Greg KH wrote: >> I will post the one client driver, which is already using this >> framework as this series. >>> Ideally you will have more than one client driver submitted, as a >>> "framework" for just one driver seems a bit odd, don't you think? >> There are other groups and vendors interested in using this >> framework. But they want to make sure that this >> framework can go to upstream Linux. We will provide one client using >> this framework at this time. >> Do you think this is a problem? > > I would love to see the feedback from those groups and vendors as well, > to ensure that they agree with this. Ideally, they would sign off on > the patches, and provide clients that work with the framework at the > same time. Otherwise, I just have to take your word for it :) I suspect that in some ways Intel is a year or two ahead in this regard, we'll see if others are willing to speak up yet ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists