| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 15:19:07 +0800 From: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com> To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>, Feng Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>, Sucheta Chakraborty <sucheta.chakraborty@...gic.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Refactor msi/msix restore code Part2 On 2013-08-02 20:01, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>>> Konrad, are you OK with this patch now? >>> Yes, I wanted to make sure that the existing behavior under baremetal >>> was not altered. >>> >>> And Duan had confirmed it was not - thought to be on a safe side it >>> would be good to confirm this via testing just in case. >> I had ever let our customer test on baremetal and it passed. > Are they OK with being credited for this in the patch? Meaning are they > OK with Reported-by-and-Tested-by: flag? sucheta.chakraborty from Qlogic also reproduced the same and I got his confirm patch worked. Already add him in tested-by. zduan > > Either way, I think the only remaining issue is to expand the git commit > a bit to include the discussion about the flow of the pci_read/pci_write > and point out that the logic remains the same. > > >> zduan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists