linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] RFC: perf, tools: Move gtk browser into separate perfgtk executable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 Aug 2013 12:18:03 +0300
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: perf, tools: Move gtk browser into separate perfgtk executable

On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> Assuming that in the normal case it can be made to work like a full build
> of perf today (i.e. without forcing LD_PRELOAD) then splitting the
> libraries away looks like a much better solution than splitting the
> binary.

Yup, if we can make it work, it's probably the best option. I'm not very
keen on splitting the binary but pulling all the GTK dependencies
like we do now is definitely a problem.

                        Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/