linux-kernel - [PATCH] fs/nfs/inode.c: adjust code alignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon,  5 Aug 2013 16:47:36 +0200
From:	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
To:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Cc:	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fs/nfs/inode.c: adjust code alignment

From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>

---

This patch adjusts the code so that the alignment matches the current
semantics.  I have no idea if it is the intended semantics, though.  Should
the call to nfs_setsecurity also be under the else?

 fs/nfs/inode.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c
index af6e806..d8ad685 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ nfs_fhget(struct super_block *sb, struct nfs_fh *fh, struct nfs_fattr *fattr, st
 		unlock_new_inode(inode);
 	} else
 		nfs_refresh_inode(inode, fattr);
-		nfs_setsecurity(inode, fattr, label);
+	nfs_setsecurity(inode, fattr, label);
 	dprintk("NFS: nfs_fhget(%s/%Ld fh_crc=0x%08x ct=%d)\n",
 		inode->i_sb->s_id,
 		(long long)NFS_FILEID(inode),

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/