linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] trivial: adjust code alignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 Aug 2013 10:52:14 -0600
From:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>, trivial@...nel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, m.chehab@...sung.com,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trivial: adjust code alignment

On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 18:19:18 +0200 (CEST)
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr> wrote:

> Oops, thanks for spotting that.  I'm not sure whether it is safe to abort 
> these calls as soon as the first one fails, but perhaps I could introduce 
> some more variables, and test them all afterwards.

Yes, it would be safe.  But it's hard to imagine a scenario where any of
those particular calls would fail that doesn't involve smoke.

The code is evidence of ancient laziness on my part.  I'll add fixing it
up to my list of things to do.

Thanks,

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/