lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 7 Aug 2013 12:22:53 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/2] x86/jump labels: Count and display the short
 jumps used

On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On another box, using a distro config, I had even better results:
>
> [    2.352448] short jumps: 193
> [    2.355407]  long jumps: 219

.. well, another way of looking at this is to say that all of this
effort saves just 579 bytes.

Yes, maybe some of those bytes are in really hot paths, but the other
side of *that* coin is that the 2-vs-5 byte jump doesn't much matter
if it's already cached.

So I'd vote for not doing this. If we had some simple way to do the
short jumps, I think it would be lovely. Or if we had to parse the ELF
files and do instruction rewriting for various other reasons, and the
jump rewriting was just one small detail.

But using 576 new lines (the diffstat for your patch 1/2 that adds the
infrastructure to do the rewriting) in order to same just about
exactly that many bytes in the binary - the effort just doesn't work
out, imnsho.

              Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ