lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 7 Aug 2013 15:16:11 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the ext4 tree

Hi Andrew,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in
fs/ext4/extents_status.c between commit 49c6efc7b80e ("ext4: add new
ioctl EXT4_IOC_PRECACHE_EXTENTS") from the ext4 tree and commit "fs:
convert fs shrinkers to new scan/count API" from the akpm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

diff --cc fs/ext4/extents_status.c
index 00e6589,9f931b2..0000000
--- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
@@@ -1091,9 -1044,7 +1102,9 @@@ static int __es_try_to_reclaim_extents(
  	struct ext4_es_tree *tree = &ei->i_es_tree;
  	struct rb_node *node;
  	struct extent_status *es;
- 	int nr_shrunk = 0;
+ 	long nr_shrunk = 0;
 +	static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
 +				      DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
  
  	if (ei->i_es_lru_nr == 0)
  		return 0;

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ