linux-kernel - Re: [ 000/102] 3.10.6-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 10 Aug 2013 20:22:30 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ 000/102] 3.10.6-stable review

On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 10:07:08PM +0000, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 08/09/2013 01:10 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 02:42:24PM +0000, Shuah Khan wrote:
> >> On 08/09/2013 07:54 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.6 release.
> >>> There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >>> let me know.
> >>>
> >>> Responses should be made by Sun Aug 11 01:46:31 UTC 2013.
> >>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >>>
> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >>> 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.10.6-rc1.gz
> >>> and the diffstat can be found below.
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>>
> >>> greg k-h
> >>>
> >
> 
> Patches applied to 3.0.89, 3.4.56 and 3.10.5
> 
> Compiled and booted on the following systems:
> 
> Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5:
>      (3.4.57-rc1, 3.10.6-rc1)
> HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics:
>      (3.0.90-rc1, 3.4.57-rc1, and 3.10.6-rc1)
> 
> dmesgs for all releases look good. No regressions compared to the 
> previous dmesgs for each of these releases. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, 
> err are clean. No regressions in warn.

Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/