linux-kernel - Re: Enable arm_global_timer for Zynq brakes boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 Aug 2013 09:53:49 -0700
From:	Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
To:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
CC:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, <srinivas.kandagatla@...com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stuart Menefy <stuart.menefy@...com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Enable arm_global_timer for Zynq brakes boot

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:49:17PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/12/2013 06:32 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:20:19AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> On 08/12/13 09:03, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>>> On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >>>>> yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
> >>>>> wake it up, no ? As Stephen stated this kind of configuration should has
> >>>>> never been tested before so the tick broadcast code is not handling this
> >>>>> case properly IMHO.
> >>>>>
> >>>> If you have a per-cpu tick device that isn't suffering from
> >>>> FEAT_C3_STOP why wouldn't you use that for the tick versus a
> >>>> per-cpu tick device that has FEAT_C3_STOP? It sounds like there
> >>>> is a bug in the preference logic or you should boost the rating
> >>>> of the arm global timer above the twd. Does this patch help? It
> >>>> should make the arm global timer the tick device and whatever the
> >>>> cadence timer you have into the broadcast device.
> >>> I finally got to test your patch. Unfortunately, it makes the system
> >>> hang even earlier:
> >>
> >> Sorry it had a bug depending on the registration order. Can you try this
> >> one (tabs are probably spaces, sorry)? I will go read through this
> >> thread to see if we already covered the registration order.
> > 
> > That did it! Booted straight into the system. 
> 
> Good news :)
> 
> > The broadcast device is
> > the TTC instead of GT, now.
> > 
> > 	Tick Device: mode:     1
> > 	Broadcast device
> > 	Clock Event Device: ttc_clockevent
> > 	 max_delta_ns:   1207932479
> > 	 min_delta_ns:   18432
> > 	 mult:           233015
> > 	 shift:          32
> > 	 mode:           1
> > 	 next_event:     9223372036854775807 nsecs
> > 	 set_next_event: ttc_set_next_event
> > 	 set_mode:       ttc_set_mode
> > 	 event_handler:  tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast
> > 	 retries:        0
> > 	
> > 	tick_broadcast_mask: 00000000
> > 	tick_broadcast_oneshot_mask: 00000000
> 
> At the first glance, the timer broadcast usage is not set, right ? Can
> you try with the cpuidle flag even if it is not needed ?

It's actually present. I have a clean 3.11-rc3 and the only changes are
my patch to enable the GT and Stephen's fix.
The cpuidle stats show both idle states being used.

	Sören


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/