linux-kernel - Re: Re-tune x86 uaccess code for PREEMPT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Aug 2013 20:12:58 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, mingo@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Re-tune x86 uaccess code for PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:09:21AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 08/09/2013 04:04 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > The x86 user access functions (*_user) were originally very well tuned,
> > with partial inline code and other optimizations.
> > 
> > Then over time various new checks -- particularly the sleep checks for
> > a voluntary preempt kernel -- destroyed a lot of the tunings
> > 
> 
> Hi Andi,
> 
> Are you going to respin this patchset to address the feedback?

Yes. I'm dropping all the user checks.

But you could already merge the first patch, it's independent
of all the others and not affected by the feedback.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/