lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:35:49 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
CC:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
	Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>,
	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>, gnurou@...il.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] ARM: add basic Trusted Foundations support

On 08/12/2013 08:29 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Trusted Foundations is a TrustZone-based secure monitor for ARM that
> can be invoked  using a consistent smc-based API on all supported
> platforms. This patch adds initial basic support for Trusted
> Foundations using the ARM firmware API. Current features are limited
> to the ability to boot secondary processors.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/tl,trusted-foundations.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/tl,trusted-foundations.txt

> +Trusted Foundations
> +
> +Boards that use the Trusted Foundations secure monitor can signal its
> +presence by declaring a node compatible with "tl,trusted-foundations"
> +(the name and location of the node does not matter).
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible : "tl,trusted-foundations"

> +- version : Must contain the version number string of the Trusted Foundation
> +	firmware.

Can the version be queried at run-time from the firmware itself?

If not, I wonder if we shouldn't instead encode the version number into
the compatible value.

Some comments on the exact format of the version property would be
useful; from the example I assume it's "%02d.%02d" % (major_ver, minor_ver)?

> diff --git a/arch/arm/firmware/Kconfig b/arch/arm/firmware/Kconfig

> +config ARCH_SUPPORTS_TRUSTED_FOUNDATIONS
> +	bool

Shouldn't that be "config ARCH_SUPPORTS_FIRMWARE", since presumably in
the future there will be more entries in the menu, and hence we want the
menu to appear if any of those entries are useful?

> +
> +menu "Firmware options"
> +	depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_TRUSTED_FOUNDATIONS

Or perhaps that comment is more appropriate for that "depends".

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ