linux-kernel - [PATCH 05/34] cpufreq: blackfin: remove calls to cpufreq_notify

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 Aug 2013 07:55:02 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	rjw@...k.pl
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Steven Miao <realmz6@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/34] cpufreq: blackfin: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()

Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:

	struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
	freqs.old = old freq...
	freqs.new = new freq...

	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);

	/* Change rate here */

	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);

This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.

Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.

Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.

Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c | 22 +++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
index 12528b2..e9e63fc 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
@@ -132,27 +132,23 @@ static int bfin_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
 #ifndef CONFIG_BF60x
 	unsigned int plldiv;
 #endif
-	struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
 	static unsigned long lpj_ref;
 	static unsigned int  lpj_ref_freq;
+	unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_CYCLES_CLOCKSOURCE)
 	cycles_t cycles;
 #endif
 
-	freqs.old = bfin_getfreq_khz(0);
-	freqs.new = bfin_freq_table[index].frequency;
+	old_freq = bfin_getfreq_khz(0);
+	new_freq = bfin_freq_table[index].frequency;
 
-	pr_debug("cpufreq: changing cclk to %lu; target = %u, oldfreq = %u\n",
-			freqs.new, freqs.new, freqs.old);
-
-	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
 #ifndef CONFIG_BF60x
 	plldiv = (bfin_read_PLL_DIV() & SSEL) | dpm_state_table[index].csel;
 	bfin_write_PLL_DIV(plldiv);
 #else
-	ret = cpu_set_cclk(policy->cpu, freqs.new * 1000);
+	ret = cpu_set_cclk(policy->cpu, new_freq * 1000);
 	if (ret != 0) {
 		WARN_ONCE(ret, "cpufreq set freq failed %d\n", ret);
 		return ret;
@@ -168,17 +164,13 @@ static int bfin_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
 #endif
 	if (!lpj_ref_freq) {
 		lpj_ref = loops_per_jiffy;
-		lpj_ref_freq = freqs.old;
+		lpj_ref_freq = old_freq;
 	}
-	if (freqs.new != freqs.old) {
+	if (new_freq != old_freq) {
 		loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(lpj_ref,
-				lpj_ref_freq, freqs.new);
+				lpj_ref_freq, new_freq);
 	}
 
-	/* TODO: just test case for cycles clock source, remove later */
-	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
-	pr_debug("cpufreq: done\n");
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/