linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 13/37] cpufreq: exynos: don't initialize part of policy that is set by core too

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Aug 2013 06:58:31 +0900
From:	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
To:	'amit daniel kachhap' <amit.daniel@...sung.com>,
	'Viresh Kumar' <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	"'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	'linaro-kernel' <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	patches@...aro.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 13/37] cpufreq: exynos: don't initialize part of policy
 that is set by core too

amit daniel kachhap wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> wrote:
> > Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and
> hence
> > this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.
> >
> > Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after
> calling
> > ->init().
> >
> > Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>

Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>

Thanks,
Kukjin

> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> This consolidation work looks fine,
> Acked-By: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
> 
> Thanks,
> Amit
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c     | 2 --
> >  drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 1 -
> >  2 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-
> cpufreq.c
> > index 79b869b..b1db082 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -226,8 +226,6 @@ static struct notifier_block exynos_cpufreq_nb = {
> >
> >  static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> >  {
> > -       policy->cur = policy->min = policy->max =
exynos_getspeed(policy-
> >cpu);
> > -
> >         /* set the transition latency value */
> >         policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 100000;
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> > index 9a5ed485..91a64d6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -316,7 +316,6 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy)
> >                 return ret;
> >         }
> >
> > -       policy->cur = dvfs_info->cur_frequency;
> >         policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = dvfs_info->latency;
> >         cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/