linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] extcon: palmas: Added a new compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid*

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 26 Aug 2013 17:33:19 +0530
From:	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC:	<bcousson@...libre.com>, <tony@...mide.com>,
	<myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>, <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	<rob.herring@...xeda.com>, <pawel.moll@....com>,
	<mark.rutland@....com>, <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
	<rob@...dley.net>, <george.cherian@...com>,
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <balbi@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] extcon: palmas: Added a new compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid*

On Saturday 24 August 2013 12:47 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/23/2013 05:28 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Friday 23 August 2013 02:20 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 08/22/2013 02:31 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>> The Palmas device contains only a USB VBUS-ID detector, so added a
>>>> compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid*. Didn't remove the existing compatible
>>>> types for backward compatibility.
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-palmas.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-palmas.txt
>>>
>>>>  PALMAS USB COMPARATOR
>>>>  Required Properties:
>>>> - - compatible : Should be "ti,palmas-usb" or "ti,twl6035-usb"
>>>> + - compatible : Should be "ti,palmas-usb-vid". "ti,twl6035-usb" and
>>>> +   "ti,palmas-usb" is deprecated and is kept for backward compatibility.
>>>
>>> So this defines one new value and deprecates the two old values.
>>
>> yeah.
>>>
>>> Why isn't a new "ti,twl6035-usb-vid" entry useful? Don't you still need
>>
>> yeah, it should be added too.
>>> SoC-specific compatible values so the driver can enable any SoC-specific
>>> bug-fixes/workarounds later if needed?
>>
>> hmm.. Palmas is external to SoC. So not sure if adding SoC specific compatible
>> values is such a good idea.
> 
> In this case, but SoC, I meant the Palmas chip rather than the
> application processor. Is twl6035 a name for Palmas or something else?

yeah, tw6035 is a name for palmas.

Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/