lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 26 Aug 2013 12:36:47 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com>,
	Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
	"R, Durgadoss" <durgadoss.r@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/7] cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core

On 26 August 2013 12:32, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:58:53 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@...aro.org
> wrote,
>> Some minor nitpicking, nothing much :)
>
> Is there any chance to pull those corrected patches to v3.12?

Only Rafael can decide :)

> After your comments I think, that this code could be rewritten:
>
>
>         list_for_each_entry(policy, &cpufreq_policy_list, policy_list) {
>                 freq_table = cpufreq_frequency_get_table(policy->cpu);
>                 if (freq_table) {
>                         ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy,
>                                                         freq_table);
>                         if (ret) {
>                                 pr_err("%s: Policy frequency update
>                                 failed\n")

Don't break strings into multiple lines even if they cross 80 columns..
And you missed __func__ :)

>                                 break;
>                         }
>
>                         policy->user_policy.max = policy->max;
>                         __cpufreq_governor(policy,CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
>                 }
>         }
>
>         return ret;
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ