linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] pinmux: Add TB10x pinmux driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:24:30 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@...lis.com>
Cc:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@...com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Sascha Leuenberger <sascha.leuenberger@...lis.com>,
	Pierrick Hascoet <pierrick.hascoet@...lis.com>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] pinmux: Add TB10x pinmux driver

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Christian Ruppert
<christian.ruppert@...lis.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 08:49:36PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Christian Ruppert
>> <christian.ruppert@...lis.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 06:53:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> >>
>> >> OK, that can also be called a "bank" or "register" but whatever.
>> >
>> > As you suggested below I re-read Documentation/pinctrl.txt and it got me
>> > even more confused:
>> > Am I right in my understanding that the whole concept of a
>> > "port/bank/register" or whatever we would like to call it does not exist
>> > in the pinctrl framework?
>>
>> Not that I know :-)
>>
>> If what it means is a number of registers from address x thru x+n
>> words in memory that is called a register range usually, the
>> Device Tree "regs" property.
>>
>> If you're referring to a subset of registers dealing with a batch
>> of pins or a single pin that can use whatever terminology you
>> want, I consider it a driver-internal detail. Some GPIO drivers
>> talk about "ports" when they have e.g. 2 x 32bit registers
>> handling a total of 64 pins, then that is port 0 and port 1 or
>> something like this, but it's really up to the driver.
>
> Actually, it's a set of pins the muxing of which is controlled by the
> same register. E.g. Port A is the set of all the pins which are
> controlled by register field A.

What is wrong with calling that a "pin-set register" or something?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/