lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 2 Sep 2013 00:41:27 -0700
From:	tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
	pjt@...gle.com, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Fix the sd_parent_degenerate() code

Commit-ID:  10866e62e8a6907d9072f10f9a0561db0c0cf50b
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/10866e62e8a6907d9072f10f9a0561db0c0cf50b
Author:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
AuthorDate: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:57:04 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 08:27:40 +0200

sched/fair: Fix the sd_parent_degenerate() code

I found that on my WSM box I had a redundant domain:

[    0.949769] CPU0 attaching sched-domain:
[    0.953765]  domain 0: span 0,12 level SIBLING
[    0.958335]   groups: 0 (cpu_power = 587) 12 (cpu_power = 588)
[    0.964548]   domain 1: span 0-5,12-17 level MC
[    0.969206]    groups: 0,12 (cpu_power = 1175) 1,13 (cpu_power = 1176) 2,14 (cpu_power = 1176) 3,15 (cpu_power = 1176) 4,16 (cpu_power = 1176) 5,17 (cpu_power = 1176)
[    0.984993]    domain 2: span 0-5,12-17 level CPU
[    0.989822]     groups: 0-5,12-17 (cpu_power = 7055)
[    0.995049]     domain 3: span 0-23 level NUMA
[    0.999620]      groups: 0-5,12-17 (cpu_power = 7055) 6-11,18-23 (cpu_power = 7056)

Note how domain 2 has only a single group and spans the same CPUs as
domain 1. We should not keep such domains and do in fact have code to
prune these.

It turns out that the 'new' SD_PREFER_SIBLING flag causes this, it
makes sd_parent_degenerate() fail on the CPU domain. We can easily
fix this by 'ignoring' the SD_PREFER_SIBLING bit and transfering it
to whatever domain ends up covering the span.

With this patch the domains now look like this:

[    0.950419] CPU0 attaching sched-domain:
[    0.954454]  domain 0: span 0,12 level SIBLING
[    0.959039]   groups: 0 (cpu_power = 587) 12 (cpu_power = 588)
[    0.965271]   domain 1: span 0-5,12-17 level MC
[    0.969936]    groups: 0,12 (cpu_power = 1175) 1,13 (cpu_power = 1176) 2,14 (cpu_power = 1176) 3,15 (cpu_power = 1176) 4,16 (cpu_power = 1176) 5,17 (cpu_power = 1176)
[    0.985737]    domain 2: span 0-23 level NUMA
[    0.990231]     groups: 0-5,12-17 (cpu_power = 7055) 6-11,18-23 (cpu_power = 7056)

Reviewed-by: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-ys201g4jwukj0h8xcamakxq1@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index cf8f100..4da0f4b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4914,7 +4914,8 @@ sd_parent_degenerate(struct sched_domain *sd, struct sched_domain *parent)
 				SD_BALANCE_FORK |
 				SD_BALANCE_EXEC |
 				SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER |
-				SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES);
+				SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES |
+				SD_PREFER_SIBLING);
 		if (nr_node_ids == 1)
 			pflags &= ~SD_SERIALIZE;
 	}
@@ -5118,6 +5119,13 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *sd, struct root_domain *rd, int cpu)
 			tmp->parent = parent->parent;
 			if (parent->parent)
 				parent->parent->child = tmp;
+			/*
+			 * Transfer SD_PREFER_SIBLING down in case of a
+			 * degenerate parent; the spans match for this
+			 * so the property transfers.
+			 */
+			if (parent->flags & SD_PREFER_SIBLING)
+				tmp->flags |= SD_PREFER_SIBLING;
 			destroy_sched_domain(parent, cpu);
 		} else
 			tmp = tmp->parent;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ