lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon,  2 Sep 2013 11:57:38 +0800
From:	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...aro.org,
	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org,
	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/6] ACPI / processor: remove unnecessary if (!pr) check

acpi_processor_errata() is only called in acpi_processor_get_info(),
and the argument 'pr' passed to acpi_processor_errata() will never be
NULL, so the if (!pr) check is unnecessary and can be removed.

Since the 'pr' argument is not used by acpi_processor_errata() any more,
so change the argument into void too.

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c |    8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 5364d02..7ce0750 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -140,15 +140,11 @@ static int acpi_processor_errata_piix4(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int acpi_processor_errata(struct acpi_processor *pr)
+static int acpi_processor_errata(void)
 {
 	int result = 0;
 	struct pci_dev *dev = NULL;
 
-
-	if (!pr)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	/*
 	 * PIIX4
 	 */
@@ -220,7 +216,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
 	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
 	static int cpu0_initialized;
 
-	acpi_processor_errata(pr);
+	acpi_processor_errata();
 
 	/*
 	 * Check to see if we have bus mastering arbitration control.  This
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ