lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 08:49:03 +0800 From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com> To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, "ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org" <ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>, Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@...il.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com> Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [PATCH] checkpatch: Add comment about updating Documentation/CodingStyle On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 12:09:31PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote: > > > Thanks! Yes I'm now running checkpatch these days because some people > > suggested to me that some of the checkpatch warnings do help catch > > real bugs. > > > > However I do try to avoid upsetting people with maybe-subjective > > warnings. A checkpatch report will only be sent when a small fraction > > of error types are detected. Comments are very welcome on how to > > improve this list: > > How hard would it be to make this configurable per-git tree? It'd be trivial to do. > I think the robot is quite useful and I don't push branches very > often, so I'd probably be OK with just getting all the checkpatch > warnings along with the build warnings and filtering the noise > myself. But I know other people have different styles and opinions. Would you tell me the git tree/branches that would like to receive all checkpatch warnings? It'll should be useful for our internal kernel team, too. Thanks, Fengguang > > MEMSET > > IN_ATOMIC > > UAPI_INCLUDE > > MALFORMED_INCLUDE > > SIZEOF_ADDRESS > > KREALLOC_ARG_REUSE > > EXECUTE_PERMISSIONS > > ERROR:BAD_SIGN_OFF > > LO_MACRO > > HI_MACRO > > CSYNC > > SSYNC > > HOTPLUG_SECTION > > INDENTED_LABEL > > INLINE_LOCATION > > STORAGE_CLASS > > USLEEP_RANGE > > UNNECESSARY_CASTS > > ALLOC_SIZEOF_STRUCT > > KREALLOC_ARG_REUSE > > USE_FUNC > > LOCKDEP > > EXPORTED_WORLD_WRITABLE > > WHITESPACE_AFTER_LINE_CONTINUATION > > MISSING_VMLINUX_SYMBOL > > NEEDLESS_IF > > PRINTF_L > > > > Once the decision is made to send a checkpatch error/warning, the > > report email will use the triggering error (the one that matters) as > > the email subject, with the complete output of checkpatch.pl included > > in email body. > > > > Thanks, > > Fengguang > > _______________________________________________ > > Ksummit-2013-discuss mailing list > > Ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-2013-discuss -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists